com.triedagents/triedagents · v1.0.0 · agents-and-memory
TriedAgents is healthy: it completed an MCP handshake in 718 ms and exposes 4 tools.
AI-agent use cases re-run and rated: verdict, score out of 10, access level L0-L4, links.
Endpoint: https://triedagents.com/mcp/ (streamable-http)
No repository listed · Website · JSON · Add to my inventory
| Users (last 30 days) | 0 |
| Handshake | Healthy |
| Auth needed | None |
| Tool count | 4 |
| Latency | 718 ms |
| Last checked (UTC) | 2026-10-21T04:25:58.132Z |
| Checked (UTC) | Status | Latency | Error |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-21T04:25:58.132Z | Healthy | 718 |
search_cases | Search TriedAgents' library of AI-agent use cases that were re-run and rated. Use this when the user asks whether an AI agent can really do a task (e.g. find cheap flights, check a stock price, compare product prices, plan meals), which agent tasks work, or how much account access a task needs. Matc |
get_case | Get the full record of one TriedAgents case by slug (from search_cases or list_top_cases): the original claim and source post, the exact prompt we ran, method, steps, sites touched, result vs. ground truth, each checked claim, score, verdict, access level, failure modes, time, cost and a ready-made |
list_top_cases | List TriedAgents cases ranked the way the site ranks them: reproduced (V2) first, then partly reproduced (V1), failed (F), not yet run (V0); higher score first within a verdict. Use this for 'what can AI agents reliably do?', 'best agent use cases' or 'what failed?' questions, optionally within one |
list_categories | List TriedAgents' case categories (with counts and page urls) and explain the rating rubric: verdicts V2/V1/F/V0, the score out of 10, and access levels L0-L4. Use this to understand the ratings or to pick a category filter for search_cases. |