Cybergenic

im.cybergenic/mcp · v1.0.0 · developer-tools

Cybergenic is healthy: it completed an MCP handshake in 2015 ms and exposes 9 tools.

Cancer gene co-occurrence and exclusivity in tumour cohorts, with confound controls and exact tests.

Endpoint: https://cybergenic.im/mcp?via=mcpregistry (streamable-http)

No repository listed · Website · JSON · Add to my inventory

Facts

Users (last 30 days)0
HandshakeHealthy
Auth neededNone
Tool count9
Latency2015 ms
Last checked (UTC)2026-10-16T03:15:15.439Z

Health history

Checked (UTC)StatusLatencyError
2026-10-16T03:15:15.439ZHealthy2015
2026-10-15T00:10:45.682ZHealthy2844

Tools (9)

lookup_gene_pairMeasured co-alteration statistics for two genes in every tumour cohort where Cybergenic's discovery scan tested the pair: tumours with both genes altered against the number expected, odds ratio, p-value and Benjamini-Hochberg q over that cohort's whole family of tested pairs, the confound control ap
gene_partnersThe genes whose driver mutations co-occur with, or are mutually exclusive with, a given gene in patient tumours, strongest first by Benjamini-Hochberg q, from every pair Cybergenic's discovery scan tested: one row per partner and independent patient source, with the tumours, observed and expected co
search_findingsSearch Cybergenic's published findings: gene-pair co-occurrence and mutual exclusivity, survival associations, CRISPR gene dependencies and single-gene leads, each with the verdict the engine measured (strengthened, weakened, inconclusive, artifact risk or novel lead) and the reason for it. The quer
get_findingThe full record of one Cybergenic finding, by id or permalink: what was measured and in which cohort, the statistics (the 2x2 table, odds ratio, p and q), the verdict and why, the confound checks, how many papers mention the genes together, CRISPR dependency and survival facts when measured, the pre
get_track_recordCybergenic's live track record: how many predictions it has locked in its hash-chained registry before re-testing them, how many replicated in an independent cohort against matched controls (including the less-studied-pair subset), and how many findings currently pass every check as both strong and
fisher_exact_testFisher's exact test for a 2x2 table [[a, b], [c, d]]: two-sided and both one-sided p-values (computed in log space, so a tiny p keeps its real exponent), the sample odds ratio, and the conditional maximum-likelihood odds ratio with its exact confidence interval (what R's fisher.test reports). For tw
chi_square_testPearson chi-square test of independence for an r x c table of counts (2x2 up to 10x10), with Yates' correction for 2x2 tables and the G-test: statistic, degrees of freedom, p-value, expected counts, adjusted residuals, Cramér's V, whether Cochran's rule for the approximation holds, and Fisher's exac
odds_ratio_relative_riskEffect sizes for a 2x2 table [[a, b], [c, d]] whose rows are two groups and whose columns are outcome yes and no: the odds ratio (Woolf interval, and the conditional exact interval), the relative risk (Katz interval), the risk difference (Newcombe interval) and the number needed to treat, at the cho
fdr_correctionMultiple-testing correction for a list of p-values: Benjamini-Hochberg q-values and Benjamini-Yekutieli, Holm, Hochberg and Bonferroni adjusted p-values, the number of discoveries at alpha for each method, and the Benjamini-Hochberg cutoff rank. Pass family_size when more tests were run than the p-v