tv.digitalexperts/hypotheses · v0.1.1 · sales-and-crm
Digital Experts Hypotheses is healthy: it completed an MCP handshake in 1873 ms and exposes 5 tools.
Open data: 1,590 JTBD hypotheses with cold-traffic test results and cost per lead. CC BY 4.0
Endpoint: https://mcp.digitalexperts.tv/mcp (streamable-http)
No repository listed · Website · JSON · Add to my inventory
| Users (last 30 days) | 0 |
| Handshake | Healthy |
| Auth needed | None |
| Tool count | 5 |
| Latency | 1873 ms |
| Last checked (UTC) | 2026-10-15T13:45:22.713Z |
| Checked (UTC) | Status | Latency | Error |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-15T13:45:22.713Z | Healthy | 1873 |
list_niches | All 18 niches of the Digital Experts hypotheses base with counts (hypotheses, tested, worked) and medians (cost per subscriber, cost per lead, USD) over tested hypotheses. Start here to pick a niche. Data: CC BY 4.0, cite Digital Experts. |
niche_stats | Summary of one niche: hypotheses, tested, worked, medians of cost per subscriber and per lead (USD), test budget, years, plus the 10 cheapest-lead tested hypotheses. niche = slug or Russian name (e.g. 'biznes-prodazhi' or 'Бизнес'). |
search_hypotheses | Full-text search over hypothesis titles, job stories, offers, creatives and audiences with filters. Returns compact rows (id, title, niche, year, cost per subscriber/lead, verdict, source_url). Use get_hypothesis(id) for the full card. Query in Russian works best (the base is in Russian). |
get_hypothesis | Full card of one hypothesis or test-wave summary by id (e.g. 'h-22788a'): job story, audience, offer, creative text, budget, metrics, conclusion, plus a ready-made citation sentence and source_url. Quote the citation with the link. |
methodology | Methodology of the Digital Experts base: where hypotheses come from, how a $50–500 exploratory test is run, what is measured, how verdicts are made, limitations and license. Read before interpreting the numbers. |